Will UC Dealers Exist in a Cloudy World?

Will UC Dealers Exist in a Cloudy World?

By Dave Michels July 21, 2014 4 Comments
Dave Michels JPG
Will UC Dealers Exist in a Cloudy World? by Dave Michels

Disruption of channels in a connected world is hardly rare. Travel agents were double-punched with online booking systems and e-tickets (eliminating the need for their specialized printers). Bookstores that survived the superstores are losing the battle to online retailers. The Internet initially offered communications VARs opportunity, but then came the squeeze from out-of-state dealers, centralized deployments, and cloud providers.

The cloud represents the biggest threat to the traditional channel, and at the most risk are VARs that service small and medium businesses.  

VARs exist primarily for two reasons: complexity and logistics. Channels thrive on complexity. If we had the know-how (and time) to do things ourselves, we would. At home, it’s the reason we call professionals such as plumbers and electricians – because plumbing and electrical matters are complex. We avoid calling plumbers and electricians if we can.

The other big justification for the reseller channel to exist is logistics. Although manufacturers give up to 70 percent of total system revenue to their channel of VARs and distributors, it’s still cheaper than servicing direct. The local resellers is (are) far better suited to find prospects and then propose, install, and service them than a national entity. It is no more viable for UCC manufacturers to sell directly than for Campbells to open canned soup stores in every city.

These reasons have provided impeccable logic and have “rung” true for the past 50 or so years. However, cloud-delivered services attack these assumptions and raise into question the very justification for the channel to exist at all. Cloud services thrive on simplicity. This gets masked in terms such as consumerization and self-service, but the fact is end users are increasingly demanding simple solutions that they can install and manage themselves. Complexity is the new evil – the cause of out-of-control budgets, wasted productivity, and inefficient processes.

Many providers of cloud services have found their services to be so simple that they can conduct the business relationship remotely. For the first time it is now viable to sell and deliver business communications directly. Simplicity diminishes the relative value that VARs add in the initial sale and with ongoing services. This creates a significant challenge for vendors with robust channels.

A solid channel takes years to develop, it has always been considered a strong asset that is hard for competitors to replicate. The natural instinct is to protect and foster these channels, but new entrants are marketing directly to end users. It is difficult for direct and indirect channels to co-exist in highly competitive environments.

It’s a bit like the copper wires that connect every home and business. Those lines were a jewel of the first world  years went into the creation of this infrastructure. At one time these networks were so valuable that courts and regulators ensured fair use and prevented price gouging. Today, carriers want nothing to do with these copper telephone network anchors. These wires are no longer assets, but liabilities that the carriers want to shed.

The cloud is a bigger threat to resellers that target SMB-sized accounts. Larger enterprises tend to work with system integrators (SIs) that hide complexity with powerful multi-vendor solutions. The cloud presents an opportunity for large SIs to create customized hosted services, examples include ArrowS3 Synaps3 (powered by Genband) and Dimension Data Cloud Services for Cisco (powered by Cisco HCS). Cloud services could strengthen the value SIs add for their larger customers and vertical segments.

The cloud will not kill the channel, but it will reduce its size. The future channel will be a network of service oriented (rather than product oriented) specialists. The proposition of value-add will evolve significantly over the next five years.

Dave Michels, TalkingPointz.


4 Responses to "Will UC Dealers Exist in a Cloudy World?" - Add Yours

Art Rosenberg 7/21/2014 5:28:11 PM

I certainly agree with your view that reselling and installing premise-based communication equipment will be displaced by cloud-based services. However, it's not going to just be simple person-to-person communication services, but rather UC-enabled mobile online apps that will provide contextual contacts, as well as CEBP interactions.

That means that the "channels" will have to act as, or work with business process consultants to identify the "use cases" that need UC enablement, as well as work with mobile app developers to design the mobile app interfaces where "click-to-contact" options will be offered. So, as you correctly point out, it's not reselling hardware or even software, but coming up with device independent (BYOD), cloud-based mobile apps that must still be customized for their different end-user business needs.

john ogrady 7/24/2014 3:34:48 PM

I tend to agree with Dave's article. Cloud services are effective when they are simple and offer 'me to' commodity solutions. This fits well into the SME and to some extent the mid market needs in many cases.
I do not see the existing channel partners being able to adopt the approach you describe Art, it is not in their nature. In my view the existing channel partners will cling on for a while and gradually disappear. If there is a need as you describe that will be served by partners with more SI competencies.
A professional service that probably will thrive in my opinion is education (for both the business and the individual users).
Art Rosenberg 7/26/2014 8:42:16 AM


Absolutely agree with your view about existing VARs, since they will not only have to become "SIs," but will have to resell "cloud" services. I also agree that educating business management and individual end users is going to be a key role for professional services. (As I have frequently suggested, if new technology were free and available, would users know what to to with it?)
Art Rosenberg 7/30/2014 7:42:55 AM

When it gets down to migrating from existing telephony-based self-service applications, the solution integrators will have to "dance at two weddings" for a while. This means continuing to service traditional customer service phone callers with existing IVR interfaces, as well as expanding those same applications to more efficient and flexible online "mobile apps" for UC-enabled "Mobile Customer Services."

This direction for mobile apps has been reinforced by the recent partnership announcement between IBM and Apple to generate business mobile apps for the big vertical markets, like government, healthcare, education, retail, etc. So, a logical first step for tomorrow's channel partners and consultants will be to help their existing clients to convert old but very limited IVR applications to multimodal mobile apps. To do that, they will benefit greatly from some new tools that will facilitate the conversion, while still enabling both voice-only IVR and new Visual IVR applications to consistently service telephone callers and mobile online customers with common applications. (A leading technology provider in this space is Jacada.)

For more insight into this expanded business opportunity for next-generation channel partners, you can read my recent white paper at:


To Leave a Comment, Please Login or Register

BC Summit 2016 UC Alerts
UC Blogs
UC ROI Tool RSS Feeds